I think of myself as a “science communicator” who can discuss my work comfortably and effectively with the general public, but I have yet to make it comprehensible by my son.
A recent conversation went like this.
“Dad, why are you going to work?”
“I have to grow some bacteria.”
“What are back-oh-teria?”
“Um, they’re like little tiny bugs that swim around in your blood.”
“Are they fish?”
“No, not really….”
Then I changed the topic.
L had more success in telling Phil about a research project that she did as an undergraduate.
“You can catch bees with a net. It isn’t that hard. I did it a lot one summer.”
“Why did you catch bees?”
“I caught them and painted them so that I could identify them.”
Phil paused thoughtfully. “Were you a science person?”
I can’t tell what the word “science” means to Phil at this point, or what aspect of the description made him think that she was doing science. But somehow a reasonable connection was made.
Maybe in a year or two he’ll realize that people who study back-oh-teria are scientists too.
Leave a comment